Paul Graham谈选择问题比解决问题更重要

美国著名程序员、博客作者和技术作家保罗·格雷厄姆(Paul Graham)在其个人网站上的长文《How to do great work》给仍然雄心勃勃的年轻人提了一些建议,适合每位对自己仍有期望的朋友反复阅读。下面是本文的第十四部分摘录:


People show much more originality in solving problems than in deciding which problems to solve. Even the smartest can be surprisingly conservative when deciding what to work on. People who’d never dream of being fashionable in any other way get sucked into working on fashionable problems.

One reason people are more conservative when choosing problems than solutions is that problems are bigger bets. A problem could occupy you for years, while exploring a solution might only take days. But even so I think most people are too conservative. They’re not merely responding to risk, but to fashion as well. Unfashionable problems are undervalued.

One of the most interesting kinds of unfashionable problem is the problem that people think has been fully explored, but hasn’t. Great work often takes something that already exists and shows its latent potential. Durer and Watt both did this. So if you’re interested in a field that others think is tapped out, don’t let their skepticism deter you. People are often wrong about this.

Working on an unfashionable problem can be very pleasing. There’s no hype or hurry. Opportunists and critics are both occupied elsewhere. The existing work often has an old-school solidity. And there’s a satisfying sense of economy in cultivating ideas that would otherwise be wasted.

But the most common type of overlooked problem is not explicitly unfashionable in the sense of being out of fashion. It just doesn’t seem to matter as much as it actually does. How do you find these? By being self-indulgent — by letting your curiosity have its way, and tuning out, at least temporarily, the little voice in your head that says you should only be working on “important” problems.

You do need to work on important problems, but almost everyone is too conservative about what counts as one. And if there’s an important but overlooked problem in your neighborhood, it’s probably already on your subconscious radar screen. So try asking yourself: if you were going to take a break from “serious” work to work on something just because it would be really interesting, what would you do? The answer is probably more important than it seems.

Originality in choosing problems seems to matter even more than originality in solving them. That’s what distinguishes the people who discover whole new fields. So what might seem to be merely the initial step — deciding what to work on — is in a sense the key to the whole game.

人们在解决问题上展现出的原创性远远超过在决定要解决哪些问题上。即使最聪明的人,在选择工作内容时也可能表现出让人惊讶的保守。那些在其他方面决不会追逐流行的人,在选择问题时也会受主流思想影响。

人们在选择问题时比解决问题时更保守的一个原因是,问题本身的风险更大。一个问题可能占用你数年时间,而找出一个解决方案可能只需几天。但即便如此,我认为大多数人在问题选择上还是过于保守。他们不仅仅是在评估风险,还在追逐时尚。那些冷门问题常被低估。

一类最有意思的冷门问题是人们误以为已经被完全探讨透彻,但实际上仍有未知的问题。伟大的工作往往是建立在已有基础上,揭示事物的更多可能。杜勒和瓦特的工作都是如此。所以如果你对一些被认为已竭尽全力的领域保持兴趣,不要被他人的怀疑所阻。人们在这方面的判断常常是错误的。

致力于一个冷门问题可以非常令人满意。这里没有炒作,也没有匆忙。投机者和批评者都去了其他地方。现有的工作通常更加老道可靠。开发那些可能被忽略的思想也有一种经济的满足感。

但是,最常被人忽视的问题类型,并不是那些在时尚意义上不流行的问题。这类问题仅仅看起来不像它实际上那样重要。你如何找到这些问题?放任自己,听从自己的好奇心,暂时压制住那个告诉你只应该关注“重要问题”的内心声音。

你确实需要解决重要的问题,但几乎每个人对“重要”的定义都太过保守。如果在你的领域存在一个重要却被忽视的问题,它很可能已经出现在你的潜意识中。所以试着问自己:如果你要从“重要的”工作中歇一歇,仅仅出于好奇和兴趣去研究一些问题,你会选择什么?答案很可能比它看起来更重要。

选择问题的原创性似乎比解决问题的原创性更为重要,这也区分了那些开创全新领域的人。因此,看似仅是一个开始的选择问题这一步,实际上是整个过程的关键。

Few grasp this. One of the biggest misconceptions about new ideas is about the ratio of question to answer in their composition. People think big ideas are answers, but often the real insight was in the question.

Part of the reason we underrate questions is the way they’re used in schools. In schools they tend to exist only briefly before being answered, like unstable particles. But a really good question can be much more than that. A really good question is a partial discovery. How do new species arise? Is the force that makes objects fall to earth the same as the one that keeps planets in their orbits? By even asking such questions you were already in excitingly novel territory.

Unanswered questions can be uncomfortable things to carry around with you. But the more you’re carrying, the greater the chance of noticing a solution — or perhaps even more excitingly, noticing that two unanswered questions are the same.

Sometimes you carry a question for a long time. Great work often comes from returning to a question you first noticed years before — in your childhood, even — and couldn’t stop thinking about. People talk a lot about the importance of keeping your youthful dreams alive, but it’s just as important to keep your youthful questions alive.

This is one of the places where actual expertise differs most from the popular picture of it. In the popular picture, experts are certain. But actually the more puzzled you are, the better, so long as (a) the things you’re puzzled about matter, and (b) no one else understands them either.

Think about what’s happening at the moment just before a new idea is discovered. Often someone with sufficient expertise is puzzled about something. Which means that originality consists partly of puzzlement — of confusion! You have to be comfortable enough with the world being full of puzzles that you’re willing to see them, but not so comfortable that you don’t want to solve them.

It’s a great thing to be rich in unanswered questions. And this is one of those situations where the rich get richer, because the best way to acquire new questions is to try answering existing ones. Questions don’t just lead to answers, but also to more questions.

很少有人意识到这一点。关于新想法最常见的误解之一,就是对其组成中问题与答案的比例认识不足。人们认为伟大的想法就是答案,但通常真正的启发在于提出的问题。

我们低估问题的一个原因是问题在学校教学中的应用方式。在学校里,问题仅仅存在于被回答之前的一瞬间,就像不稳定的粒子一样。但是一个真正好的问题绝不仅仅如此。一个真正好的问题本身就是一个部分的发现。新物种是如何出现的?使物体下落的力量和引起行星运行的力量是同一种吗?光是提出这样的问题,你就已经踏入了令人振奋的新领域。

背负悬而未决的问题会让你不适,但是你背负得越多,就越有可能注意到解决方法——或者,更让人兴奋的,发现有些问题竟有相同之处。

有时候你会花很长时间思考一个问题。伟大的工作常常源自多年前你首次注意到的问题——可能是你童年的疑惑——并无法停止思考。人们常说要保持童真的梦想,但保持那好奇心也同样重要。

这是实际专业知识与普遍观念中最大差异之一。在普遍观念中,专家被认为是确定无疑的。然而,实际上,你越是感到困惑,就越好,只要(a)你困惑的事情很重要,(b)没有其他人理解它们。

想象一下在一个新的想法被发现之前发生的情况。通常情况下,具备足够专业知识的人会对某事感到困惑。这意味着原创性在某种程度上包含了困惑——混乱!你必须对世界充满谜团感到足够舒适,以至于你愿意去发现它们,但又不能过于舒适以致不想解决它们。

拥有众多未回答的问题是一件很棒的事情。而这正是富者更富的情况之一,因为获取新问题的最佳方法就是尝试回答已有的问题。问题不仅仅引导我们找到答案,还会带来更多问题。

Read more

纸笔与数字的碰撞:我的手账与日记实践之路

纸笔与数字的碰撞:我的手账与日记实践之路

昨天的主要时间都用来补日记和手账,春节期间欠账太多,这次补日记以数字为主,都写在备忘录里,手账写到后面反而一天只有一句,不过我尽量挑选了贴近的单向提示词贴上去,也算是拼贴手账了。 自从了解到了ForeverNotes——一个根植于苹果备忘录的笔记系统,就尝试实践了一下。 用备忘录有几个好处: 1. 苹果备忘录功能够强,除了图谱、双链,笔记的基本功能都有,不需要折腾。 2. 系统原生应用,不会黄。 3. 不需要考虑附件位置。 4. 多设备同步不是问题,尽管有人说iCloud是屎,但我目前没遇到意外,同步延迟什么的,我没有即时更新的需求,影响不大。 另一方面,我尝试将纸质手账和数字日记结合使用,一个月下来两边都还算坚持下来了。 我使用快捷指令计时,如之前所说,Notion可以自动统计时长占比,手动誊写到国誉自我days上可以很方便地实现可视化,不需要在手机电脑上打开应用查看。有时会忘记激活快捷指令,但好在后续也能回忆起大致的用时情况,实践结果可以接受。 临时想法如果不方便在电脑上记录会写在随身携带的A7小本子上,方便的话就即时写到备忘录当天的笔记里。 ForeverN

数字工具规划,手账记录,我觉得这样感觉还挺好的

又一次要提到手账,自从在无印良品店看到今年份的手账本后就逐渐沉迷,直至11月份终于入坑。我是一个热衷于钻研感兴趣事物的人(暂且不谈有没有成果),到今天为止,小红书推给我的内容已经至少有60%与手账相关了,有一些用法让我很有启发: 📚我的手帐哲学|时间轴的再认识 - 慢慢 J人狂喜:靠这本手帐做时间设计有点太爽! - 宁宁的秘密基地 和国誉DAYS在一起的第一周|手帐心得 - 我们爱手帐_主编君 一日一页时间轴 | 国誉自我 | 使用心得 - 云蔓的手帐生活 目前手账本的用法 从上面的推荐内容可以看出,我换了新本子,现在同时在用的是三本:之前买的muji A5活页本、能率5002、国誉自我Days。Muji的任意日程本是很经典的周历布局,我原本打算日期页对折,一半写待办,一半写完成,自由书写页就任意发挥: 实际写下来,我发现我的待办规划是在Todoist而不是在纸本上完成的,于是这部分就开了天窗,自由书写部分成了每日小结,事事都想写一面A5就不太够了。正值年末,不少人在小红书上发自己的“手账体系”,本数和玩法都乍舌,实在是给我开辟了一个新世界,

明确主线,建立系统,2025年肯定会更好

明确主线,建立系统,2025年肯定会更好

重当牛马之后,越来越觉得新环境新模式带来的挑战巨大,过往的经验并不能直接套用在新工作上,这让我十分焦虑。一方面,我急需有所产出,尽快站稳脚跟,另一方面,理清方向和工作流,才能更快盘活资源,让自己更轻松,否则持续被KPI牵着鼻子走,无论是工作还是生活的节奏都会乱套。然而工作环境无法改变,我能做的只有让自己去适应。 11月里,我读了《OKR工作法》,有点启发,新换公司很容易被各种陌生的信息扰乱视线,失去焦点,OKR的重心便是聚焦,正是我当下需要的。我尝试用Notion实践OKR的方法,结合一直沿用的GTD和PARA,缝合出了一套模板,两个月下来边用边完善,自我感觉到了可以拿出手的程度了。 参考思路 系统分工 上图是我缝合怪系统的思路。 * PARA(绿色):作为分类框架,旨在辨别各项信息、待办所处的状态 * OKR(红色):作为价值标准,在于聚焦主线相关的资源 * GTD(蓝色):执行流程,将主线任务进行到底 思考过程 1. “Area”作为需要长期履行的职责,可以约等于一个阶段的人生主线,基于此,

2024年最爱的三个产品

2024年最爱的三个产品

又到了年终,各种题材的盘点回顾不可缺少,我也不能免俗。今年虽然无比艰难,但在应用上还是没少花钱,明确记得付过费的就有如下几款: * Flomo,国内人气笔记应用。 * Hazel,知名Mac端自动化应用。 * Scapple,老牌白板工具。 * Todoist,老牌GTD应用。 * 黑神话:悟空,想必无需多言。 似乎还挺节制的😊,回到正题,简单讲一下今年对我来说比较重要的3款应用,不局限于上面提到的。 小红书/微信公众号 第一名要给小红书和微信公众号,两个并列。自从去年开始做号,尽管进度缓慢,但这些媒体平台还是给了我远超现实的正反馈,我收获了几百个关注者,通过零星的产品出售获得了少量变现,让我成就感满满。 通过内容生产,我对未来有了一些新的思路,不再仅仅局限于传统的认真工作,努力生活的思维。 代码和媒体是不需要许可就能使用的杠杆。这两个杠杆是新富阶层背后的杠杆。你可以创建软件和媒体,让它们在你睡觉时为你工作。 ––纳瓦尔 我的内容远谈不上优质,但依然有人喜欢,有人付款,这对我意义很大,给了我被需要的感觉。 感谢每个浏览我内容甚至为之付费的朋友!